Early neutrophil responses are potential biomarkers to predict severe COVID-19 in adults
Rattachement africain : sg, gb, jp, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In the early COVID-19 pandemic, the strain on healthcare facilities highlighted the need for reliable biomarkers to predict progression to severe COVID-19. Neutrophils, the most abundant leukocytes in circulation, are early defenders against pathogens. In a Singaporean adult cohort, early neutrophil mediators were assessed for their suitability as prognostic biomarkers of COVID-19 complications. Plasma levels of myeloperoxidase, elastase, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in 35 non-severe and 14 severe cases were measured twice, 2-7 days apart after hospitalisation. Nineteen controls were included. The levels of MPO, elastase, suPAR and sST2 were significantly higher in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to those with mild and healthy controls. At baseline sampling, MPO and suPAR predicted severe COVID-19 and had AUROCs of 0.76 and 0.87, respectively. MPO and suPAR at cut-off values of 26.41 ng/ml and 3.19 ng/ml, respectively showed approximately 71% sensitivity and 81 - 84% specificity to differentiate severe COVID-19. In contrast, elastase and neutrophil counts were less predictive of severe disease. In adult COVID-19, MPO and suPAR may be reliable prognostic biomarkers of severe disease during acute COVID-19. Further validation of these markers in a larger cohort and in other infectious diseases is warranted.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Early neutrophil responses are potential biomarkers to predict severe COVID-19 in adults
- Date Crossref
- 20/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.