Genetic dissection of MutL complexes in Arabidopsis meiosis
Rattachement africain : bg, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
During meiosis, homologous chromosomes exchange genetic material through crossing over. The main crossover pathway relies on ZMM proteins, including ZIP4 and HEI10, and is typically resolved by the MLH1/MLH3 heterodimer, MutLγ. Our analysis shows that while MUS81 may partially compensate for MutLγ loss, its role remains uncertain. However, our multiple mutant analysis shows that MUS81 is unlikely to be the sole resolvase of ZMM-protected recombination intermediates when MutLγ is absent. Comparing genome-wide crossover maps of mlh1 mutants with ZMM-deficient mutants and lines with varying HEI10 levels reveals that crossover interference persists in mlh1 but is weakened. The significant crossover reduction in mlh1 also increases aneuploidy in offspring. The loss of MutLγ can be suppressed by eliminating the FANCM helicase. Combined with the lower-than-expected chiasma frequency, this suggests that in MutLγ absence, some ZMM-protected intermediates are ultimately resolved by DNA helicases and/or their complexes with Top3α. Elevated MLH1 or MLH3 expression moderately increases crossover frequency, while their misregulation drastically reduces crossover numbers and plant fertility, highlighting the importance for tight control of MLH1/MLH3 levels. By contrast, PMS1, a component of the MutLα endonuclease, appears uninvolved in crossing over. Together, these findings demonstrate the unique role of MutLγ in ZMM-dependent crossover regulation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Genetic dissection of MutL complexes in <i>Arabidopsis</i> meiosis
- Date Crossref
- 27/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.