Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular risk factors (data from Russian epidemiological studies)
Rattachement africain : ru, pl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aim. To study the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its association with cardiovascular risk factors (RFs). Material and methods. The database from the ESSE-RF2 and ESSE-RF3 epidemiological studies was used, including data from surveys of population aged 35-64 years in 18 Russian regions (n=21204). To assess the prevalence of NAFLD, the fatty liver index (FLI) was used. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical programming language and the R environment (version 3.6.1) with open-source code. The significance level for all tested hypotheses was p≤0,05. Results. Standardized prevalence rates of FLI ≥60 in the ESSE-RF3 study are slightly higher than in the ESSE-RF2 study (39,2% vs 42,3%, respectively). Multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, age, region, settlement type, and education showed significant associations of FLI ≥60 with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperuricemia, lipid metabolism disorders, elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, and cerebrovascular accident in men and women. Conclusion. Multivariate analysis confirmed the closest association of NAFLD with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic disorders, nonspecific inflammation, dyslipidemia, and cerebrovascular accident in men and women.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular risk factors (data from Russian epidemiological studies)
- Date Crossref
- 08/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.