Predicting variant histology in bladder cancer: the role of multiparametric MRI and vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS)
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS score in detecting muscle invasion in variant urothelial carcinomas (VUC). (2) To identify spesific MRI features that may serve as predicting for VUC. METHODS: ) value, were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS score in predicting muscle invasion was calculated using a cut-off point of ≥ 4 in both cohorts. Univariate logistic regression were also performed to identify MRI features that predict VUC. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: values were significantly lower in the VUC cohort (p = 0.003). The VI-RADS score demonstrated high diagnostic performance across both VUC and PUC cohorts, with sensitivity ranging from 94.4 to 86.8% (reader 1) and 94.2-82.2% (reader 2), specificity ranging from 100 to 94.6% (reader 1) and 100-94% (reader 2), and accuracy ranging from 96 to 90.6% (reader 1) and 96-88.2% (reader 2). The area under the curve (AUC) ranged between 0.972 and 0.972 (reader 1) and 0.838-0.781 (reader 2). No significant differences in diagnostic performance were observed between readers or cohorts (p > 0.05), and inter-reader agreement for VI-RADS scores was excellent for both cohorts. CONCLUSION: values can serve as potential predictors of VUC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Predicting variant histology in bladder cancer: the role of multiparametric MRI and vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS)
- Date Crossref
- 18/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.