Virtual reality relaxation for student wellbeing: a systematic review

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose High levels of stress among students can adversely affect their wellbeing and academic performance. Effective stress management is crucial, yet traditional relaxation methods often pose challenges in implementation. Virtual reality (VR) relaxation, delivered through head-mounted displays (HMDs), offers an innovative approach to stress relief, promoting relaxation and restoring wellbeing. This study aims to review the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of VR relaxation for enhancing student wellbeing. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases was conducted. Studies using immersive, interactive, three-dimensional virtual environments via HMDs to measure or improve wellbeing, stress, relaxation or mood-related outcomes in post-secondary students were included. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool (PROSPERO: CRD42023396672). Findings This review included 24 studies (n = 1,811) published between 2007 and 2023. A majority of participants were university students across various disciplines. Virtual environments often featured natural audio-visual elements, showing that VR relaxation is feasible, acceptable and yields short-term improvements in wellbeing. Thirteen studies received “strong” EPHPP ratings, eight were rated “moderate” and four “weak.” Research limitations/implications The limited number of randomised controlled trials and lack of long-term data necessitate cautious interpretation of results. Further rigorous research is recommended. Practical implications VR relaxation presents a promising intervention to reduce stress, enhance relaxation and improve mood among students. Originality/value This review highlights VR relaxation as a novel, practical solution for student wellbeing, contributing valuable insights to the field of mental health innovation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.