Clinical treatment score post-5 years and survival benefit from extended endocrine therapy for breast cancer patients under and over 50 years of age
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether clinical treatment score post-5 years (CTS5) could predict the clinical benefits of extended endocrine therapy (ExET) in young and old patients. METHODS: We reviewed 2495 hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated between 2001 and 2012 who were free from recurrence or death during the 5 years post-surgery in South Korea. The cohort was analyzed separately based on age (≤ 50 years and > 50 years). Multivariable analysis was conducted, and a cutoff of CTS5 < 3.13 was defined as the low group and CTS5 ≥ 3.13 as the intermediate/high (int/high) group. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 115 months. Regardless of young and old age at diagnosis, the low group displayed considerably enhanced disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that the low group emerged as an independent and favorable prognostic factor for disease-free survival after adjusting for ExET use and prognostic parameters. Patients in the low group demonstrated a trend toward improved overall survival compared to those in the int/high group, reaching marginal statistical significance. ExET use demonstrated a significant correlation with improved disease-free survival, particularly in patients aged ≤ 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: ExET should be considered in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer patients with high CTS5 levels.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinical treatment score post-5 years and survival benefit from extended endocrine therapy for breast cancer patients under and over 50 years of age
- Date Crossref
- 17/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.