Is Attention All You Need for EEG to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest?
Rattachement africain : tw, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) poses a significant health challenge, necessitating accurate predictions of neurological outcomes in comatose patients, where good outcomes are defined as the recovery of most cognitive functions. Electroencephalogram (EEG) serves as a valuable biomarker for monitoring neurological states due to its rich, time-dependent information. This study aims to predict neurological outcomes using early EEG data by employing the Transformer model, which leverages multi-headed attention to identify patterns in lengthy sequences such as hour-long EEG recordings. Unlike traditional methods that use subsampled EEG epochs, we utilize the entire EEG sequences, subdivided into time steps, allowing our model to capture detailed temporal patterns via the attention mechanism. Moreover, we trained our proposed model using each EEG recording as an individual data sample but evaluated our model through aggregated patient-wise predictions. This approach allows us to boost the data sample size. Our results demonstrate promising predictive performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.82 and AUPRC of 0.90 on the holdout test set and an AUROC of 0.73 and AUPRC of 0.93 on an external test set with patient-wise predictions. This study highlights the potential of utilizing attention mechanisms to capture important time series progressions across EEG sequences for improving SCA prognosis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Is Attention All You Need for EEG to Predict Neurological Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest?
- Date Crossref
- 10/11/2024
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.