PRELIMINARY DATA REGARDING DOGS AS WNV SENTINELS
Résumé fourni par la source
West Nile Virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that has a zoonotic character determining an inapparent infection, mild unspecific symptoms as flu like manifestations or a severe encephalitis, and can also affect other mammals, including dogs. Most dogs exposed to WNV exhibit mild symptoms such transient fever, lethargy, or loss of appetite. Severe neurological manifestations, including ataxia, seizures, and paralysis, are rare but can occur in immunocompromised or highly exposed animals. The role of dogs as amplifying hosts is minimal due to low-level viremia. However, despite the relatively low risk to dogs, the presence of WNV in canine populations reflects broader environmental and public health concerns, as it can serve as a marker for potential human exposure. This preliminary study aimed to verify the hypothesis of dogs as indicators of WNV evolution. Samples collected in 2023 and 2022 from a public dog shelter and a veterinary private clinic from Iasi County were tested for the presence of specific anti WNV antibodies. The results showed and overall prevalence of 37,5% [(IC 95% (27.38 - 47.62)] in the dog samples collected from the dog shelter and a 18,4% [(IC 95% (10.96-25.94)] in the samples collected from the private practice. Those are in accordance with the epidemiological situation in humans in 2023 and 2022 in the County. The study is preliminary and intend to add data to the international research. Further analyses are needed to clarify if dogs can be considered sentinels for WNV infection in humans.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- PRELIMINARY DATA REGARDING DOGS AS WNV SENTINELS
- Date Crossref
- 13/12/2024
- Éditeur
- Universitatea de Ştiinţele Vieţii "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" din Iaşi
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.