A novel robotic technique for creating the retrosternal route in gastric conduit reconstruction
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background The optimal reconstruction route after esophagectomy remains controversial. The retrosternal route has the advantage of a lower risk of fatal complications. However, the blind maneuver to create a retrosternal route may cause bleeding and pleural injury. Herein, we report a novel robotic technique for creating a retrosternal route.Methods This study included 43 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with robotic retrosternal route reconstruction between April 2021 and December 2023. Clinicopathological findings and perioperative outcomes, including the time required to create the retrosternal route, were retrospectively analyzed. The creation times were also compared among surgeons.Results The median age and body mass index of the patients were 68 years (range: 46–80) and 21.4 kg/m2 (range: 16.6–30.2 kg/m2), respectively. Twenty-six patients (60%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median time to create the retrosternal route was nine minutes (range, 5–14 min). No cases showed pleural injury or postoperative hemorrhage associated with this procedure. There was no significant difference in the time taken to create the retrosternal route between the four surgeons (p = 0.434).Conclusions Robotic creation of a retrosternal route for gastric conduit reconstruction is simple, easy to learn, and results in a safe and feasible procedure.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A novel robotic technique for creating the retrosternal route in gastric conduit reconstruction
- Date Crossref
- 13/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.