The Multiple Streams Framework and Non‐Politicized Issues: The Case of Assisted Dying/Assisted Suicide

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT This article applies agenda‐setting theory, and the multiple streams framework in particular, to consider why assisted dying/assisted suicide (AD/AS) has not been legalized in the United Kingdom, and also what the prospects are for policy change. AD/AS provides an interesting test case for agenda‐setting theory, which tends to focus on governmental agendas (Kingdon 2011, 3) and has thus been said to ‘say less about the policy outcomes of such nonpoliticized policy processes’ (Green‐Pedersen 2007, 286) that generally characterize morality polices. Agenda‐setting theory provides valuable insights into this case, which reveals an important role for government even on this free vote matter of conscience. However, the case highlights aspects of agenda‐setting theory relating to assumptions on legitimacy and the power of persuasion that fare less well, and which have implications for the future study of morality policies. Related Articles Angervil, G. 2021. “A Comprehensive Application of Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework: An Analysis of the Obama Administration's No Child Left Behind Waiver Policy.” Politics & Policy 49, no. 5: 980–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12432 . Knackmuhs, E., Farmer, J., and Knapp, D. 2020. “The Interaction of Policy Narratives, Moral Politics, and Criminal Justice Policy Beliefs.” Politics & Policy 48, no. 2: 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12343 . Silagadze, N. 2021. “Abortion Referendums: Is There a Recipe for Success?” Politics & Policy 49, no. 2: 352–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12398 .

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.