Development of a Hybrid Measurement System for Surgical Instrument Motion of Laparoscopic Surgery
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Laparoscopic surgery has become a common surgical technique owing to its minimal invasiveness. However, surgeons require advanced techniques, and several studies have evaluated surgical skills through motion measurements to improve skill proficiency. However, existing measurement systems have a low tolerance for occlusion and are difficult to use in operating rooms with many obstacles. Therefore, a hybrid measurement system was developed for laparoscopic surgery. This system consists of an inertial measurement unit (IMU), a distance sensor, and an optical motion capture (MoCap). When MoCap data are unavailable, surgical instrument motion is calculated using the IMU and distance sensor data, and when it is available, the IMU drift is corrected using MoCap data. The MoCap markers were arranged individually, thus facilitating the measurement of multiple instruments simultaneously. The validation experiment in the wet-lab training confirmed that the error was smaller than that measured using MoCap alone, and the subjects expressed that the subjective disturbance caused by the sensors was very small during the procedure. The measurement experiment was conducted in cadaver surgical training, and 15 cases of nephrectomy were successfully recorded. This system facilitated highly accurate measurements during practical surgical training and surgical skills analysis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development of a Hybrid Measurement System for Surgical Instrument Motion of Laparoscopic Surgery
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2025
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.