Self-Distillation Prototypes Network: Learning Robust Speaker Representations without Supervision
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Training speaker-discriminative and robust speaker verification systems without explicit speaker labels remains a persistent challenge. In this paper, we propose a novel self-supervised speaker verification approach, Self-Distillation Prototypes Network (SDPN), which effectively facilitates self-supervised speaker representation learning. SDPN assigns the representation of the augmented views of an utterance to the same prototypes as the representation of the original view, thereby enabling effective knowledge transfer between the augmented and original views. Due to lack of negative pairs in the SDPN training process, the network tends to align positive pairs quite closely in the embedding space, a phenomenon known as model collapse. To mitigate this problem, we introduce a diversity regularization term to embeddings in SDPN. Comprehensive experiments on the VoxCeleb datasets demonstrate the superiority of SDPN among self-supervised speaker verification approaches. SDPN sets a new state-of-the-art on the VoxCeleb1 speaker verification evaluation benchmark, achieving Equal Error Rate 1.80%, 1.99%, and 3.62% for trial VoxCeleb1-O, VoxCeleb1-E and VoxCeleb1H respectively1, without using any speaker labels in training. Ablation studies show that both proposed learnable prototypes in self-distillation network and diversity regularization contribute to the verification performance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Self-Distillation Prototypes Network: Learning Robust Speaker Representations without Supervision
- Date Crossref
- 06/04/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.