Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Synchronous versus asynchronous delivery of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer: Does timing matter?

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of variations in the timing of chemotherapy and radiation on clinical outcome for patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 264 consecutive adult patients treated with concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were reviewed. Among these 187 patients (71 %) had chemotherapy and radiation commencing on the same day ("synchronous delivery") and 87 patients had chemotherapy and radiation commencing on different days ("asynchronous delivery"). RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial estimates of overall survival (74 % vs. 76 %), progression-free survival (75 % vs. 75 %), and local-regional control (71 % vs. 73 %) were not significantly different between concurrent chemoradiation patients treated by synchronous and asynchronous delivery methods, respectively (p > 0.05, for all). Exploratory subset analysis using the 1, 3, 7, 10, and 14 day cutoffs as thresholds for starting chemotherapy and radiation together demonstrated that patients who had greater than a 7 day gap between chemotherapy and radiation had significantly worse 3-year overall survival (63 % vs. 78 %, p = 0.01), progression-free survival (59 % vs. 77 %, p = 0.01), and local-regional control (65 % vs. 74 %, p = 0.02) compared to those whose treatment commencement occurred within 7 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: While the clinical repercussions of not starting concurrent chemotherapy and radiation on the same day are likely of minimal consequence for patients with head and neck cancer, efforts to start treatments within 7 days of one another are recommended.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Synchronous versus asynchronous delivery of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer: Does timing matter?
Date Crossref
01/05/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Head and Neck Cancer StudiesHead and Neck Surgical OncologyAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.