Comparison of Electrical, Thermal, and Mechanical Performances of a fcBGA with that of a Fan-Out SiPlet Package
Résumé fourni par la source
This paper studied a package originally designed with a flip chip ball grid array package (fcBGA), and now is converted to a single-chiplet fan-out package (SiPlet™). The simulation or experimental data is used to compare the electrical, thermal, and mechanical performances of a fcBGA and a SiPlet™. The SiPlet™'s redistribution layers (RDL) are much thinner compared to the substrate layers on the fcBGA package. The thin RDL layers of SiPlet™ mean smaller distances in between the signal traces and the ground planes, and, as a result, the package has lower crosstalk. The thinner RDL layers on the SiPlet™ package also help reduce the transmission loss of electrical signals. The impedance, Insertion Loss (IL), Return Loss (RL), and far-end crosstalk of both fcBGA and SiPlet™ were simulated and compared. From the thermal aspect, the thermal conductivities of the dielectric layers are usually very low, such that the thin RDL of SiPlet™ introduces very low thermal resistance for the heat to be dissipated from silicon to the bottom components. [1] Finally, the mechanical behaviors and the cost of manufacturing are discussed to have a more thorough picture of the differences of two packages. [2]
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Electrical, Thermal, and Mechanical Performances of a fcBGA with that of a Fan-Out SiPlet Package
- Date Crossref
- 03/12/2024
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.