Enhanced performance in SOFC cathodes via B‐site co‐dopant switching in PBSCF0.25 and PBSFC0.25 layered perovskites
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Two cathodes, PrBa 0.5 Sr 0.5 Fe 1.75 Co 0.25 O 5+ δ (PBSFC0.25) and PrBa 0.5 Sr 0.5 Co 1.75 Fe 0.25 O 5+ δ (PBSCF0.25), were synthesized by a wet chemistry route through complexing agent's process. Thermogravimetric analysis and differential thermal analysis were done for the uncalcined powders to observe the thermal behavior. Pure single‐phase structures of the compounds were obtained after a final sintering temperature of 1100°C for 5 h. Samples were crystallized in the orthorhombic structure in the space group (Pmmm). Scanning electron microscope and EDS analysis show the crystalline composites with excellent porosity percentages. The porosity was higher in PBSFC2.5 than PBSCF0.25. Conductivities of two cathodes were examined in air environment from 500 to 800°C with an interval of 50°C. It has found that PBSFC0.25 is higher in conductivity of 3.0068 S/cm with less polarization resistance of 0.05 Ω than PBSCF0.25 with conductivity of 2.306 S/cm and polarization resistance of 0.066 Ω. PBSFC0.25 has shown a reasonable enhancement in performance of 0.699 W/cm 2 at 800°C, higher than PBSCF0.25 (0.608 W/cm 2 ) at the same temperature. Even at 600°C, the power density of PBSFC0.25 was 0.245 W/cm 2 , higher than the PBSFC0.25, which was found to be 0.220 W/cm 2 . Thereby, PBSFC2.5 is recommended to be a good candidate for air electrode at the intermediate range temperature.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Enhanced performance in SOFC cathodes via B‐site co‐dopant switching in PBSCF0.25 and PBSFC0.25 layered perovskites
- Date Crossref
- 25/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.