Unidentified artifacts and ornament production in the Late Bronze Age of the Southern Trans-Urals
Rattachement africain : ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Materials of archaeological excavations of the Bronze Age sites contain many items, the functions of which are quite difficult to determine. The subject of this study is a group of artifacts that, in our opinion, are related to the production of ornaments: ceramic saucers with signs, molds, cross-shaped pendants. A number of molds and ceramic saucers contain prints similar in form to cross-shaped pendants — the only type of molded ornaments in the Bronze Age of the Southern Trans-Urals and Kazakhstan. At the same time, the dimensions of negatives on the molds and saucers do not match in size with known finds of cross-shaped pendants, which does not allow considering them as working specimens used for casting these ornaments. Regarding ceramic saucers, various versions about their functions, from ritual to production (molds), have been proposed. The X-ray fluorescence analysis of the inside of the prints on ceramic saucers recorded past contact with metal — tin and lead, and to a lesser extent with copper. Various types of scientific analyses have found that tin and lead are concentrated in large quantities in bronze alloys, used for making cross-shaped pendants. Based on this, a hypothesis has been proposed regarding their possible application combining the ritual and utilitarian aspects, i.e. their potential use in rituals related to the production of ornaments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Unidentified artifacts and ornament production in the Late Bronze Age of the Southern Trans-Urals
- Date Crossref
- 15/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Tyumen Scientific Center of the SB RAS
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.