Risk Factors in Elective Colon Surgery for the Elderly: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From the Swedish Part of the International ERAS Database
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The growing proportion of older individuals worldwide is anticipated to lead to an increase in the number of elderly patients requiring surgery for colon cancer. Consequently, it is crucial to identify specific risk factors for mortality and complications after colon surgery in this age group. METHODS: The Swedish part of the ERAS registry (EIAS) between 2009 and 2022 was used. Patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing colon surgery were compared with younger patients regarding risk factors for severe complications and mortality after multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, three risk factors specifically associated with severe complications in elderly patients were identified: severe pulmonary disease (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.04-2.58), recent immunosuppressive treatment (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.30), and left hemicolectomy (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.04-1.97). Furthermore, four risk factors for mortality, statistically significant only in the older age group, were found: male sex (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.08-2.76), ASA ≥ 3 (OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.66-5.15), severe pulmonary disease (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.02-5.06), and open surgery (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.04-2.73). CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for severe complications and 30-day mortality specific to the elderly group were identified. Among these, severe pulmonary disease was associated with both severe complications and mortality.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Risk Factors in Elective Colon Surgery for the Elderly: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis From the Swedish Part of the International ERAS Database
- Date Crossref
- 08/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.