Phase synchronisation in coupled oscillator chains with endpoint heterogeneity

Le résumé fourni par la source

The emergence of collective dynamics within heterogeneous networks is a key feature of many biological networks. Heterogeneity of excitability, for example, has become a focus in the study of how pancreatic islets coordinate insulin secretion. This has raised the question of how highly excitable nodes might coordinate collective dynamics through networks where a large percentage of the population is intrinsically quiescent. To study this, we consider a discrete version of the Complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, parameterised such that in the absence of coupling, the endpoints exhibit globally attracting limit cycle behaviour and the interior nodes exhibit globally attracting trivial fixed point dynamics. Through model simulation and numerical continuation, we interrogate the relationship between model parameters and the stability of several phase-locked solutions of the system, focussing on two key solution types, the chevron and anti-phase chevron solutions, in which the exterior nodes exhibit a phase difference of 0 and π , respectively. We find that the anti-phase chevron solution stabilises as the excitability of the interior nodes decreases, or as the shearing effect of non-zero, coupling-induced amplitude perturbations from the natural limit cycle increases. Moreover, we find multiple regions of bistability with solutions with different phase synchronisation properties, highlighting that solutions observed in such networks may depend sensitively on initial conditions. Overall, our work highlights that chains with distributed heterogeneity exhibit a multitude of phase synchronised solutions, which are likely to be relevant in a range of real world networks. • Coordination of heterogeneous units is crucial for systems like pancreatic islets. • Phase locking of active nodes can be mediated through chains of quiescent nodes. • We study conditions for stable in-phase and anti-phase solutions. • Loops of symmetry broken solutions underpin stability exchange of these solutions. • Regions of bistability emerge as a consequence of these stability changes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.