An Exploration of the Practical Paths for the Ideological and Political Construction of the College English Course from the Micro - perspective of "Three All - Round Education"
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Ideological and Political Construction of The Curriculum is the fundamental task of establishing moral character and promoting the connotative development of higher education, and foreign language teaching, as an important part of higher education, is closely connected with the construction of the curriculum, and is committed to constructing a foreign language education and educating system that involves all the staffs, runs through the whole process, and covers the whole range of people. Based on the micro-perspective of the Three All - Round Education , this study discusses the practical path of the construction of "English for University Purposes" through the whole process of course teaching, all aspects of course teaching and all members, the planning of the whole process of course ideology and politics teaching links, the integration of a full range of multi-dimensional course ideology and politics resources, and the systematic coordination of the "faculty, teachers and students" all-member ideology and politics co-power, so as to provide a better opportunity for the construction of the ideology and politics of foreign language teaching courses. The aim is to provide reference for the in-depth promotion of the construction of foreign language teaching program.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An Exploration of the Practical Paths for the Ideological and Political Construction of the College English Course from the Micro - perspective of "Three All - Round Education"
- Date Crossref
- 28/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.