Unravelling genetic differentiation between Glossina brevipalpis populations from two distant National Parks in Mozambique
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract African trypanosomosis (AT), caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Trypanosoma , has plagued the African continent for centuries, affecting both humans and animals. Vector control represents an efficient way to reduce the burden of AT. In Mozambique, control campaigns reshaped tsetse fly distribution to what it is today, with Glossina brevipalpis and G. austeni as the dominant species in the South. Additionally, G. brevipalpis can be found in two National parks, Gorongosa National Park in the Centre and Maputo National Park in the South, with an 840 km wide tsetse-free zone between them. In order to improve our knowledge of the genetic diversity and gene flow of these populations and their probable isolation, we undertook a population genetics study with 11 microsatellite loci. We found that these two zones behave as isolated subpopulations, only exchanging a few individuals per year. To explain this finding, we suggest the existence of undocumented pocket populations between the two parks, or, in the absence of these, the accidental translocation of tsetse flies during human-driven animal transportation. We concluded that such undocumented means of dispersal should be explored further in studies investigating Glossina populations, to allow for the design of more efficient control strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Unravelling genetic differentiation between <i>Glossina brevipalpis</i> populations from two distant National Parks in Mozambique
- Date Crossref
- 05/03/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.