Community Member Shopping Experiences in Dollar Store Food Environments in Baltimore, Maryland
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Dollar stores are a rapidly expanding yet understudied food retailer in urban settings. Community member experiences with dollar-store food environments at a local level are not well established in the current literature. Objectives: This qualitative study sought to understand community member perspectives on dollar-store food environments and shopping experiences. Methods: Thirty-five participants across 15 zip codes in Baltimore, Maryland completed an in-depth interview and/or engaged in a workshop between December 2022 and July 2023. A thematic analysis was utilized to construct common themes across the participants' perspectives. Results: Six predominant themes were constructed and fell into 1 of 2 categories: food level and store level. For the food-level themes, participants described dollar-store food options as limited and low quality, yet at affordable prices. Among the store-level themes, lack of customer service, poor cleanliness, and stocking challenges in dollar stores were emphasized by participants. Conclusions: Community members from a range of neighborhoods held similar perceptions, specifically about what could be improved about the food environment of their local dollar stores. Future research should assess the feasibility of programs and policies to systematically improve shopping experiences and ultimately support healthy food purchasing in these retail spaces.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Community Member Shopping Experiences in Dollar Store Food Environments in Baltimore, Maryland
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.