Nanoscience systematic review methodology standardization

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The field of nanoscience has undergone significant transformations in the past two decades, presenting researchers with a complex and dynamic environment. Navigating the vast array of scholarly publications in nanoscience poses a formidable challenge, exacerbated by inconsistencies in research outcomes. Despite the exponential growth in nanoscience literature, the lack of systematic reviews in the field hampers the consolidation and synthesis of knowledge, potentially impeding progress and applications. This article addresses this challenge by offering a comprehensive guideline for systematic reviews in nanoscience, bridging critical knowledge gaps and providing a structured approach for scholars at varying expertise levels. The guideline emphasizes methodological rigor, transparency, and applicability, acknowledging the evolving nature of nanoscience data and methodologies. By clarifying misconceptions about literature reviews and cautioning against “vote counting,” the article contributes to enhancing the credibility and transparency of nanoscience research. The presented guideline aligns with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses principles, accommodating the diverse objectives of nanoscience research. As nanoscience continues to advance, this guideline aims to establish standards that foster reliable, transparent, and impactful systematic reviews, ultimately contributing to the field’s development and global applicability.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.