Aggregate Sampling to Detect Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease in US Feedlots: A Pilot Study
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the leading cause of feedlot morbidity and mortality. Field diagnosis is often limited to visual examination as available diagnostics reflect individual animals only and require labor, animal restraint, and time. Aggregate sampling techniques are valuable tools in other species but are lacking in the beef industry. This pilot study investigates the plausibility of using the water trough as an aggregate sample substrate in pens of confined cattle. Water and swab substrates from ten water tanks were collected at ten sampling events. Samples were subjected to a multiplex PCR to detect viruses, bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes associated with BRD. Viral and bacterial PCR detections differed significantly among morbidity classes (Fisher’s exact p = 0.0139 water; p = 0.0222 swab). The overall kappa and Percent Positive Agreement were 0.72 and 84.01% among sample substrates. Bayesian latent class analysis was used to estimate the probability of detection. Viral and bacterial organisms reached peak sensitivity (21–79%) on days 4–21 and peak specificity (44–79%) on days 42–56. All AMR genes’ sensitivity and specificity remained relatively constant throughout the sampling period.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Aggregate sampling to detect pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes associated with bovine respiratory disease in U.S. feedlots: A pilot study
- Date Crossref
- 28/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Texas A&M University Libraries
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.