Post-mortem validation of in vivo TSPO PET as a microglial biomarker
Résumé fourni par la source
Neuroinflammation is a feature of many neurodegenerative diseases and is quantified in vivo by PET imaging with radioligands for the translocator protein (TSPO, e.g. 11C-PK11195). TSPO radioligand binding correlates with clinical severity and predicts clinical progression. However, the cellular substrate of altered TSPO binding is controversial and requires neuropathological validation. We used progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) as a demonstrator condition, to test the hypothesis that 11C-PK11195 PET reflects microglial changes. We included people with PSP-Richardson's syndrome who had undergone 11C-PK11195 PET in life (n = 8). In post-mortem brain tissue from the same participants, we characterized cell-type specific TSPO expression and quantified microgliosis in eight cortical and 11 subcortical regions. Double-immunofluorescence labelling for TSPO and cell markers showed TSPO expression in microglia, astrocytes and endothelial cells. Microglial (and not astrocytic) TSPO levels were higher in donors with PSP compared to control subjects (n = 3), and correlated with changes in microglial burden. There was a significant positive correlation between regional 11C-PK11195 binding potential ante-mortem and the burden of post-mortem CD68+ phagocytic microglia, as well as microglial TSPO levels. We conclude that in vivo disease-related changes in 11C-PK11195 binding is largely driven by microglia and can be interpreted as a biomarker of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in tauopathies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Post-mortem validation of <i>in vivo</i> TSPO PET as a microglial biomarker
- Date Crossref
- 26/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.