Telemedicine in Glaucoma Management: Patient Perspectives
Rattachement africain : ch, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PRÉCIS: Patient satisfaction and perspectives on telemedicine for glaucoma are crucial for validating the efficacy of remote health care. This study underscores its acceptance by patients in a single academic practice. PURPOSE: To evaluate patient satisfaction and preferences with telemedicine visits integrated into a glaucoma practice. METHODS: A prospective observational study of patients of a single glaucoma specialist's telemedicine practice was performed using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 219 patients contacted, 153 (69%, mean age 67.0 y, 58% women) completed the survey. 68% had glaucoma (43% mild, 44% moderate, and 13% severe) and 32% were glaucoma suspects. Patients had been under the care of the specialist for 10±6.2 years, with 41% having undergone surgery with the specialist. The mean number of prior office visits with the specialist was 9.7±6.3 (range 1-24 y) with an average of 0.8 (range 0-3) prior telemedicine visits at the time of the survey. Ninety-seven percent reported satisfaction with integrated telehealth visits, and 78% would recommend telemedicine visits. Ninety-three percent planned to continue with telemedicine; 5 patients (3%) requested switching to in-person only visits with another provider. Compared with their in-person visits, patients found integrated telemedicine visits less time-consuming and more convenient. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates high satisfaction and support for integrated telemedicine visits among glaucoma patients within a specialized practice setting.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Telemedicine in Glaucoma Management: Patient Perspectives
- Date Crossref
- 04/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.