Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Initial Experience with the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: The Pipeline Vantage Flow diverter (Vantage) is the latest generation of Pipeline flow diverters introducing Cobalt-chronium drawn-filled tubing and 48 to 68 wires. Purpose: We report the initial safety and efficacy of Vantage in treating intracranial aneurysms in the published literature. Data Sources: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to established protocols. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, and Embase databases up to December 2023. Original studies reporting treatment outcomes for intracranial aneurysms using Vantage in more than five patients were included. Study Selection: Pooled data from 5 studies (373 patients, 418 aneurysms) were analyzed. Data Analysis: Outcomes of interest were: technical success, occlusion rates, complication outcomes and mortality. Data Synthesis: A technical success rate of 99.2% (95% CI: 98.29%–100%) was found. In unruptured cases, success rate was 378/383 (99.6%) versus 17/20 (85.0%) in ruptured cases (P < .01). Complete occlusion rate was 74.3% (95% CI: 67.43%–80.59%), with no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured cases (P = 0.72); median of follow up 6 months. Overall mortality rate was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.01%–3.64%), significantly higher in ruptured (18.6%; 95% CI: 5.13%–36.26%) versus unruptured cases (0.23%; 95% CI: 0%–1.36%) (P < 0.01). Hemorrhagic complications occurred at 1% (95% CI: 0%–3.36%) pooled rate. Thromboembolic complications were reported at 6.1% (95% CI: 2.60%–10.73%), decreasing to 4.35% (95% CI: 1.91%–7.54%) after excluding one outlier study. Limitations: Only five studies, some with small number of patients, were included in this meta-analysis which may limit the generalizability of our findings. The absence of long term follow-up also limits the assessment of treatment durability. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, we found that Vantage initial experience is similar to previous version of the Pipeline Embolization Device in terms of safety and efficacy for treatment of intracranial aneurysms, in particular unruptured aneurysms. Further prospective and comparative studies with patient outcome data specific to aneurysm location are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of Vantage.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Initial Experience with the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Date Crossref
27/02/2025
Éditeur
American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentHemostasis and retained surgical items

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.