Understanding the Impact of True vs. Positive VR Feedback on EEG Features and BCI Performance
Rattachement africain : pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices, offering significant potential for rehabilitation and assistive technologies. A major challenge is the performance gap between BCI training and real-time control due to the variability of the underlying brain signals measured using EEG and user mental strategies. Virtual Reality (VR) plays a crucial role in BCI training by providing immersive, embodied feedback, enhancing user engagement, and potentially improving performance. This study investigates how closed-loop BCI systems, based on motor imagery (MI) of left and right-hand movements, with different VR feedback modalities-comparing true vs. positive feedback-impact EEG features like Event-Related Desynchronization (ERD) and BCI performance. Fifteen participants performed MI BCI training and control, in a VR environment, designed to induce increased sense of embodiment. Our results show consistent classification accuracy and ERD levels across both feedback conditions, indicating that VR feedback, when embodying a virtual body, whether true or positive, supports stable BCI performance. Additionally, key discriminative features emerged outside conventional ERD regions, highlighting the value of exploring non-traditional EEG features for MI task differentiation. This study underscores the importance of VR in optimizing closed-loop BCI systems and improving understanding of neurophysiological responses during MI tasks.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Understanding the Impact of True vs. Positive VR Feedback on EEG Features and BCI Performance
- Date Crossref
- 27/01/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.