A Phase 2 Study of Tislelizumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Cisplatin-Ineligible High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with cisplatin-ineligible high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-arm phase 2 trial (NCT04672330), 20 patients with high-risk UTUC were enrolled. Eligibility criteria included high-risk UTUC (defined as high-grade UTUC confirmed by endoscopic biopsy or urinary cytology, radiographic evidence of invasion [cT2-T4N0-2M0], and/or hydronephrosis), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, no previous systemic therapy, and cisplatin ineligibility. Patients received neoadjuvant tislelizumab before radical surgery. Contrast-enhanced MRI was performed before the third dose and again before surgery. The primary end point was pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0). Secondary end points included pathological response rate (≤ypT1N0), objective response rate, disease-free survival, safety profile, and perioperative complications. Multiplex immunofluorescence assessed immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment. RESULTS: T cells in the tumor stroma of partial and complete responders. CONCLUSIONS: macrophages in the tumor stroma may serve as potential predictors of response to neoadjuvant tislelizumab.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Phase 2 Study of Tislelizumab as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Cisplatin-Ineligible High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.