Influence of perceptions of reporting nurses’ medical errors and patient safety culture on patient safety nursing practices in Korea: a cross-sectional study
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: This study investigated how perceptions of reporting nurses' medical errors and patient safety culture affected patient safety nursing practices. Methods: The participants in this descriptive study were 157 nurses at four medical institutions located in Seoul, South Korea, recruited by convenience sampling. A cross-sectional design was employed. The data were obtained through self-reporting questionnaires from August 13 to 28, 2021. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0. Descriptive statistics were obtained, and the t-test, analysis of variance, Scheffé test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression were performed. Results: The factors influencing patient safety nursing practices were total practical experience as a nurse (≥ 6 years), perceptions of patient safety culture, and perceptions of reporting nurses' medical errors. The overall explanatory power of these factors regarding patient safety nursing practices was 25.1%. Conclusion: To improve patient safety nursing practices, hospitals should provide education on patient safety nursing practices. Moreover, interventions should be developed and applied to promote the creation of a patient safety culture.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Influence of perceptions of reporting nurses’ medical errors and patient safety culture on patient safety nursing practices in Korea: a cross-sectional study
- Date Crossref
- 28/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Korean Society of Biological Nursing Science
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.