Too Much of a Good Thing? Telework Intensity and Workplace Experiences
Rattachement africain : be, lu. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT At a time when numerous organisations are urging a return to the office while many employees prefer to continue teleworking, it is crucial to ascertain the optimal level of telework intensity. In the present study, we determine this ideal level with respect to self‐rated employee attitudes, behaviour, well‐being, social relations and professional growth. Drawing on a five‐wave longitudinal dataset, we apply fixed effects regression analyses to investigate associations between telework intensity and various dimensions of workplace experience. We offer more robust empirical evidence for favouring hybrid work schedules over office‐only or telework‐only regimes, owing to significant advances in causal inference for linear and non‐linear associations compared to the majority of existing studies that examine linear associations based on cross‐sectional data. Our results point toward modest inverted U‐shaped associations between telework intensity and self‐rated job satisfaction, work–life balance, relationships with colleagues and professional development, with optimal levels peaking around 50% teleworking. For task efficiency and work concentration, the association appears to be concave with a plateau, stabilising at teleworking levels above 70%. Only between telework intensity and employer connectedness do we observe a slightly negative linear association. Age emerges as the most prominent moderator, with within‐person increases in telework intensity being evaluated slightly more positively with increasing age across several workplace outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Too Much of a Good Thing? Telework Intensity and Workplace Experiences
- Date Crossref
- 10/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.