Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

5Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
68Institutions déclarées
13Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, be, gb, es, ru, it, at, ee, fi, de, lv, pl, kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) versus preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: A Phase III non-inferiority study randomised patients with OAG/OHT 1:1 to receive preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion or preserved latanoprost. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in peak (9:00 A.M. ± 1 h) and trough (4:00 P.M. ± 1 h) IOP at Week 12 (non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval for treatment difference of ≤1.5 mmHg). Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score and in ocular surface disease (OSD) average symptom score at Week 12 (in patients with baseline CFS ≥ 1 or OSD score > 0, respectively). RESULTS: Non-inferiority criteria for IOP-lowering were met. Least square (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) IOP change from baseline with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion (N = 193) versus preserved latanoprost (N = 193) at Week 12 was -8.8 (0.3) mmHg versus -8.2 (0.3) mmHg at peak (difference: -0.6 mmHg; nominal p = 0.023); -8.6 (0.2) mmHg versus -8.1 (0.3) mmHg at trough (difference: -0.5 mmHg; p = 0.080). LS mean change in CFS (SE) was -0.7 (0.07) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and -0.4 (0.08) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p < 0.001). LS mean change in OSD symptom score was -0.3 (0.1) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and -0.2 (0.1) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p = 0.090). CONCLUSIONS: Preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion demonstrated non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy compared with preserved latanoprost, and improved signs and symptoms of OSD.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Date Crossref
25/02/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Institut de la VisionInsermUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesUniversité Paris-SaclayCentre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-VingtsSorbonne UniversitéUniversitair Ziekenhuis LeuvenKU LeuvenCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAddenbrooke's HospitalAnglia Ruskin UniversityUniversidad de ZaragozaHospital Universitario Miguel ServetIvanovo State Medical AcademyFondazione G.B. BiettiKlinikum KlagenfurtMedical University of ViennaTartu University HospitalEast Tallinn Central HospitalUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopio University HospitalClinique Jules VerneHôpitaux Universitaires Paris-OuestUniversité de BordeauxBordeaux Population HealthCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NantesNantes UniversitéJohannes Gutenberg University MainzKlinikum MagdeburgUniversität HamburgUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfStarnberg HospitalIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoUniversity of Rome Tor VergataPoliclinico San Matteo FondazioneUniversity of UdineRiga East University HospitalPauls Stradiņš Clinical University HospitalRiga Stradiņš UniversityWojskowy Instytut MedycznySzpital Uniwersytecki w KrakowieGórnośląskie Centrum MedyczneMiędzyleski Szpital Specjalistyczny w WarszawieIntersectoral Research and Technology Complex Eye MicrosurgeryBudgetary Healthcare Institution of Omsk Region Regional Clinical HospitalFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. PetersburgFederal State Scientific Institution Research Institute of Eye DiseasesMoscow State University of Medicine and DentistryMinistry of Health of the Russian FederationSaratov City Clinical Hospital № 2 named. IN AND. RazumovskyYonsei UniversitySeverance HospitalSeoul National University HospitalThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's HospitalCatholic University of KoreaHospital Quirón TorreviejaHospital Clínico San CarlosHospital Clínic de BarcelonaClinica Universidad de NavarraFernández-Vega Ophthalmological InstituteBarraquer Opthalmology CenterInstitut Català de RetinaWest Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustWest Suffolk HospitalQueen Alexandra HospitalPortsmouth Hospitals NHS TrustImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Glaucoma and retinal disordersOcular Surface and Contact LensVestibular and auditory disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.