Effect of hydration schedules on dose‐limiting toxicity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with cisplatin
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine if head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with cisplatin chemoradiotherapy and short hydration (SH) experience less dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and receive more cisplatin than those with medium hydration (MH) or long hydration (LH). METHODS: cisplatin. Mixed models assessed the hydration schedule's effect on cumulative dose. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included. DLT occurrence was comparable between hydration groups (P = .060), but DLT type differed (P = .007). Nephrotoxicity was common with LH and MH (n = 11, 61% and n = 26, 45%, respectively), and ototoxicity with SH (n = 35, 36%). DLT occurrence in triweekly patients differed between LH and MH (n = 18, 64% vs n = 25, 32%, P = .004), but not between MH and SH (P = .171) or LH and SH (P = .055) patients. Cisplatin dose differed between LH and MH (median 200 vs 300, P = .008) as well as between LH and SH (median 200 vs 300, P = .024) but not between MH and SH (P = .429) patients. Hydration had no effect on dose (F = 2.09, P = .125). CONCLUSIONS: DLT cause differed between hydration groups, with less nephrotoxicity but more ototoxicity in HNSCC patients with SH. Triweekly cisplatin LH patients had more DLT and lower cumulative dose compared to MH and SH, but no hydration effect in general on dose was found.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of hydration schedules on dose‐limiting toxicity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with cisplatin
- Date Crossref
- 24/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.