Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Accelerated Cardiac Cine Imaging

Le résumé fourni par la source

Two-dimensional (2D) cine imaging is essential in routine clinical cardiac MR (CMR) exams for assessing cardiac structure and function. Traditional cine imaging requires patients to hold their breath for extended periods and maintain consistent heartbeats for optimal image quality, which can be challenging for those with impaired breath-holding capacity or irregular heart rhythms. This study aims to systematically assess the performance of a deep learning-based reconstruction (Sonic DL Cine, GE HealthCare, Waukesha, WI, USA) for accelerated cardiac cine acquisition. Multiple retrospective experiments were designed and conducted to comprehensively evaluate the technique using data from an MR-dedicated extended cardiac torso anatomical phantom (digital phantom) and healthy volunteers on different cardiac planes. Image quality, spatiotemporal sharpness, and biventricular cardiac function were qualitatively and quantitatively compared between Sonic DL Cine-reconstructed images with various accelerations (4-fold to 12-fold) and fully sampled reference images. Both digital phantom and in vivo experiments demonstrate that Sonic DL Cine can accelerate cine acquisitions by up to 12-fold while preserving comparable SNR, contrast, and spatiotemporal sharpness to fully sampled reference images. Measurements of cardiac function metrics indicate that function measurements from Sonic DL Cine-reconstructed images align well with those from fully sampled reference images. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that Sonic DL Cine is able to reconstruct highly under-sampled (up to 12-fold acceleration) cine datasets while preserving SNR, contrast, spatiotemporal sharpness, and quantification accuracy for cardiac function measurements. It also provides a feasible approach for thoroughly evaluating the deep learning-based method.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.