Parallels and discrepancies between non‐native species introductions and human migration
Rattachement africain : kw, pt, ar, tr, vi, pl, gb, de, us, ro, at, be, es, cz, fr, dk, fi, it, au, ca, mx, nz, ph, Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Parallels and discrepancies between non‐native species introductions and human migration
- Date Crossref
- 20/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Gulf University for Science & Technology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Minho Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio‐Sustainability pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagónico pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Instituto Patagonico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales Grupo de Ecología en Ambientes Costeros (GEAC) pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Muğla University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
United States Virgin Islands Department of Health pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
University of Łódź pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Bournemouth University Department of Life and Environmental Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M Department of River Ecology and Conservation pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
RAND Corporation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Babeș-Bolyai University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Gulf University for Science & Technology, Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio‐Sustainability — University of Minho et Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagónico, avec 9 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Afrique du Sud.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.