Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis of AP2/ERF Gene Family in Passiflora edulis Sims
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Apetala2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) family represents a critical group of transcription factors in plants, recognized for their roles in growth, development, fruit ripening, and postharvest processes. This study aimed to identify and characterize the AP2/ERF gene family in passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) and investigate their potential roles in flavor enhancement. A total of 91 PeAP2/ERF genes were identified and classified into five subfamilies. Chromosome localization and collinearity analysis demonstrated their distribution across all nine chromosomes of passion fruit, with tandem duplication events identified as a key driver of family expansion. Exon–intron configurations and motif compositions were highly conserved among PeAP2/ERF genes. Promoter cis-acting element analysis indicated potential regulation by environmental signals, including abiotic and biotic stresses, as well as hormonal cues. Postharvest storage induced the expression of 59 PeAP2/ERF genes over time. Notably, PeAP2-10 was found to enhance the expression of PeSTP6, a gene associated with sugar transport, suggesting its potential influence on the flavor profile of passion fruit. These findings provide valuable insights into the functional roles of PeAP2/ERF genes in passion fruit, highlighting their significance in postharvest management and flavor quality enhancement strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis of AP2/ERF Gene Family in Passiflora edulis Sims
- Date Crossref
- 20/02/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.