Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 conference-abstract

Efficacy and toxicity profile of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) based combination therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): A systematic review of clinical trials.

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

813 Background: ADCs have revolutionized the treatment landscape of aUC and are being evaluated as part of combination regimens with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or other ADCs. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability profile of ADC-based combination therapy in aUC. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases for published prospective clinical trials through July 2024. Peer-reviewed clinical trials evaluating ADCs as part of a combination regimen in aUC were included. We extracted safety and efficacy outcomes, including objective-response rate (ORR), any-grade adverse events (AEs), and grade ≥3 AEs. We excluded reviews, editorials, retrospective studies, and case reports. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for relevance, followed by a full-text review to confirm eligibility. Results: 627 evaluable patients from 5 prospective trials investigating enfortumab vedotin or sacituzumab govitecan were identified. Overall, we recorded an ORR of 66.2%. 366 patients across all studies experienced ≥ grade 3 AEs, for a risk rate (RR) of 58.4%. By using a random-effects model, the pooled RR for AEs (Grade≥3) was 61% (95% CI, 52%–69%; P=0.18; Table). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (RR 0.14 [95% CI 0.04- 0.40]), anemia (RR 0.10 [95% CI 0.03-0.30]), and maculopapular rash (RR 0.10 [95% CI 0.04-0.23]). Distribution of specific AEs varied significantly based on regimen, with a higher incidence of ≥grade 3 anemia, neutropenia, and diarrhea in SG-based combinations (SG+ EV and SG+ CPI). Conclusions: While ADC-based combination regimens show promising responses, they also have high rates of AEs in patients with aUC. Further clinical trials evaluating these combination regimens are crucial to further optimize the role of ADCs in this disease setting. Safety/tolerability profile for any grade and grade ≥3 AEs. Toxicity Any Grade Grade≥3 Risk rate, 95% CI Risk rate, 95% CI Anemia 0.31 [0.09; 0.66] 0.10 [0.03; 0.30] Neutropenia 0.24 [0.05; 0.65] 0.14 [0.04; 0.40] Diarrhea 0.51 [0.19; 0.82] 0.07 [0.02; 0.17] Peripheral sensory neuropathy 0.50 [0.47; 0.54] 0.03 [0.02; 0.05] Fatigue 0.45 [0.26; 0.65] 0.06 [0.03; 0.13] Maculopapular rash 0.36 [0.26; 0.47] 0.10 [0.04; 0.23]

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy and toxicity profile of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) based combination therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): A systematic review of clinical trials.
Date Crossref
10/02/2025
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.