Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Ultra-Restrictive Transfusion Thresholds in Critically Ill Adults: Are We Ready for the Next Step?

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

• Anemia is common in critically ill patients and is treated with RBC transfusions. • The current applied threshold of 7 g/dL is supported by landmark trials, but lower thresholds remain untested in the critically ill. Various patient groups are exposed to HB levels <7 g/dL with minimal impact on outcomes. • Lowering the transfusion threshold reduces costs and associated risks. • Lowering the transfusion threshold reduces donor burden. Anemia is almost universal in critically ill patients, with 25% receiving blood transfusions as clinicians aim to prevent insufficient oxygen delivery. The current 'restrictive' hemoglobin (Hb) threshold of 7 g/dL for the nonbleeding critically ill population is supported by several landmark transfusion trials. While some trials have investigated lower transfusion thresholds, these were not conducted in this specific population. Transfusion is associated with various risks including transfusion-associated circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, and hemolytic reactions. Moreover, transfusion products are scarce and expensive as they are produced from voluntary blood donations. Therefore, it is essential to limit blood transfusion to when absolutely necessary. Research indicates that several patient categories tolerate lower Hb levels than 7 g/dL. For instance, studies on acute hemodilution in healthy volunteers have shown that lower Hb levels do not lead to organ ischemia. Similarly, studies involving patients who refuse transfusions, often report lower Hb levels down to 5g/dL or less. These lower Hb levels appear to have limited impact on mortality or morbidity related outcomes. In patients with severe burns or hematological disorders, Hb levels below 7 g/dL are not associated with significant adverse outcomes. These findings suggest that the transfusion threshold for critically ill patients could potentially be lowered, as Hb levels under 7 g/dL do not inherently lead to increased mortality or morbidity. An individualized approach to deciding whether to transfuse or not might be best. This shift in transfusion practice could help reduce costs and minimize the risks associated with blood transfusions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Ultra-Restrictive Transfusion Thresholds in Critically Ill Adults: Are We Ready for the Next Step?
Date Crossref
01/04/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Blood transfusion and managementTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationHemoglobin structure and function

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.