SATINN v2: automated image analysis for mouse testis histology with multi-laboratory data integration
Rattachement africain : us, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Analysis of testis histology is fundamental to the study of male fertility, but it is a slow task with a high skill threshold. Here, we describe new neural network models for the automated classification of cell types and tubule stages from whole-slide brightfield images of mouse testis. The cell type classifier recognizes 14 cell types, including multiple steps of meiosis I prophase, with an external validation accuracy of 96%. The tubule stage classifier distinguishes all 12 canonical tubule stages with external validation accuracy of 63%, which increases to 96% when allowing for ±1 stage tolerance. We addressed generalizability of SATINN, through extensive training diversification and testing on external (non-training population) wildtype and mutant datasets. This allowed us to use SATINN to successfully process data generated in multiple laboratories. We used SATINN to analyze testis images from eight different mutant lines, generated from three different labs with a range of tissue processing protocols. Finally, we show that it is possible to use SATINN output to cluster histology images in latent space, which, when applied to the eight mutant lines, reveals known relationships in their pathology. This work represents significant progress towards a tool for robust, automated testis histopathology that can be used by multiple labs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- SATINN v2: automated image analysis for mouse testis histology with multi-laboratory data integration
- Date Crossref
- 17/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.