Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Efficacy and Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Toddlers: Open-Label Extension to EPITOPE

16Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
74Institutions déclarées
9Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, nl, gb, ca, de, fr, at, au, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: The pivotal phase 3 EPITOPE trial, a 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of epicutaneous immunotherapy with the VIASKIN patch containing 250 μg of peanut protein (VP250), previously reported significant treatment response versus placebo in peanut-allergic toddlers aged 1 through 3 years. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interim efficacy and safety of VP250 from the first year of the EPITOPE open-label extension (OLE) study. METHODS: Eligible participants enrolled in the OLE study for up to 3 years of total treatment with annual double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) and safety assessments; here we report the first-year OLE (year 2) results. RESULTS: A total of 266 EPITOPE participants enrolled in the OLE study; 244 underwent month 24 DBPCFC (n = 166 VP250; n = 78 placebo). After 24 months of VP250, 81.3% reached an eliciting dose (ED) ≥1000 mg, 63.8% reached an ED ≥2000 mg, and 55.9% completed the DBPCFC (cumulative dose: 3444 mg) without meeting stopping criteria. No treatment-related anaphylaxis or serious treatment-related adverse events occurred during year 2 in this treatment arm. Local application-site reactions occurred less frequently in year 2 versus year 1. In placebo-treated EPITOPE participants, outcomes after 1 year of open-label VP250 were consistent with EPITOPE treatment results: 62.7% reached an ED ≥1000 mg, 36.5% reached an ED ≥2000 mg, and 28.4% completed the DBPCFC without meeting stopping criteria; and there was 1 treatment-related anaphylaxis event. CONCLUSIONS: Two years of VP250 in young peanut-allergic children demonstrated continued increases in treatment effect without new safety signals. This supports the potential of VP250 as a safe and effective treatment for peanut allergy in young children. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT03859700.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy and Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Toddlers: Open-Label Extension to EPITOPE
Date Crossref
01/05/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Children's Hospital ColoradoUniversity of Colorado DenverUniversity of PittsburghChildren's Hospital of PittsburghTexas Children's HospitalErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s HospitalUniversity of ManchesterCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineGoethe University FrankfurtChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUniversity of PennsylvaniaBanner - University Medical Center TucsonBC Children's HospitalUniversity of ChicagoCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInsermCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de LilleCenter for Infection and Immunity of LilleCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de NancyDéveloppement, Adaptation et HandicapUniversité de LorraineVanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity of California, San FranciscoGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustUniversitätsklinikum St. PöltenKarl Landsteiner University of Health SciencesSouthampton Children's HospitalThe University of SydneyChildren's Hospital at WestmeadUniversity of California, Los AngelesRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandChildren's Health Ireland at CrumlinSheffield Children's NHS Foundation TrustArkansas Children's HospitalUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillRiley Hospital for ChildrenIndiana University – Purdue University IndianapolisUniversity of San DiegoUniversity of California San DiegoHôpital Necker-Enfants MaladesUniversité Paris CitéAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de ParisLe Bonheur Children's HospitalUniversity of Rochester MedicineNorthwestern UniversityLurie Children's HospitalThe Kids Research Institute AustraliaThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health ServiceRoyal Children's HospitalAllergy, Asthma and Clinical Research CenterBioCryst Pharmaceuticals (United States)Women's and Children's HospitalLurie Children's HospitalRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern UniversityUniversity of MichiganBoston Children's HospitalChildren's NationalStanford UniversityUniversity College CorkCork University HospitalLung InstituteGolisano Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenDell Children's Medical Center of Central TexasEmory UniversityChildren's Healthcare of AtlantaUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav CarusSydney Children's HospitalIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiJohns Hopkins UniversityENT and AllergyDBV Technologies (France)

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsPeanut Plant Research Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.