Neurodevelopment and Growth 2 Years After Probiotic Supplementation in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomised Trial
Rattachement africain : se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIM: To assess neurodevelopment and growth at 2 years corrected age in children born extremely preterm, supplemented with Limosilactobacillus reuteri or placebo. METHODS: Design: Secondary analysis of register data after randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Inclusion at two neonatal intensive care units in Sweden. Local follow-up per national guidelines. SUBJECTS: 134 infants born at 23-27 weeks' gestation with a birth weight < 1000 g. INTERVENTION: colony forming units), from within 72 h after birth to postmenstrual week 35-36. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bayley-III developmental assessment and auxology at 24 ± 3 months corrected age. RESULTS: Follow-up data were available for 110 of 117 surviving participants, and 85 children were assessed with Bayley-III. Mean language score after supplementation with L. reuteri was 90 (95% confidence interval: 85-95) compared to 83 in the placebo group (95% CI: 78-88), p = 0.04. No other significant differences in neurodevelopment or growth were observed. CONCLUSION: Supplementation with L. reuteri in extremely preterm infants was not associated with altered growth nor general neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years while language index was improved. This is interesting given previously reported early improved growth of head circumference.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Neurodevelopment and Growth 2 Years After Probiotic Supplementation in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomised Trial
- Date Crossref
- 13/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.