Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

Severe maternal morbidity in the high income setting: a systematic review of composite definitions

12Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is an important indicator for the improvement of maternity care. Measurement of SMM varies, limiting global comparisons. To promote concordance we studied how SMM has been defined in epidemiological practice. Methods: Comprehensive composite definitions of SMM in pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postnatal that captured both obstetric and non-obstetric processes in high-income settings were identified through a prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42023421377) systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar 01/01/1993-31/08/2024. Clinical concepts, diagnostic and procedural codes captured by definitions of SMM were compared and the variation between definitions was described. Findings: The initial search identified 7852 records and 40 studies were included: 28 studies that reported 32 definitions of SMM for use with administrative data, with median incidence of 11.4/1000, and 13 studies that reported 13 definitions for use with the primary medical record, with median SMM incidence of 6.7/1000. The majority of definitions included cardiac, respiratory, and renal dysfunction or failure; haemorrhagic, thrombotic or infective morbidity; and critical interventions. Up to 75% of cases of SMM under some definitions involved transfusion. The main source of variation between definitions was the selection and definition of common obstetric diagnoses. Variation in the sources of additional routine data required to construct a definition also limited comparability. Interpretation: Despite common approaches to defining SMM, there are opportunities to improve comparability. No two definitions for use with administrative data in different settings involved a similar incidence and set of components and involved a similar distribution of components among cases. Harmonization of the purpose, constituent codes, and sources of data would facilitate comparisons between maternity systems. Funding: This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [MR/X006115/1] as well as the National Institute for Health Research [NIHR204430].

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Severe maternal morbidity in the high income setting: a systematic review of composite definitions
Date Crossref
01/03/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Maternal and fetal healthcareCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.