Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Case Report: We report a case of a 37-year-old female with kidney transplant, who was admitted at our hospital due to worsening renal function, nephrotic proteinuria, and anemia developed 21 days after the second dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Laboratory tests revealed hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Given the clinical picture of Thrombotic Micro-angiopathy (TMA) and severe renal impairment, plasma exchange (PEX) and dialysis were immediately started. Laboratory workup showed low C3 and C4 levels, normal activity of ADAMTS13, and the absence of anti-factor H antibodies. Molecular biology investigations revealed a heterozygous variant in exon 22 (SCR20) of the CFH gene (c.3628C>T; p.Arg1210Cys) described as an atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) causative mutation. Our patient completed two sessions of PEX followed by eculizumab treatment with hematological improvement but no recovery of renal function. This is the first reported case of aHUS triggered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a kidney transplant patient without recovery of renal function. Conclusion: Although rare, clinicians should be aware of possible nephrological complications that may appear after vaccination.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review
- Date Crossref
- 11/02/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.