Velocity Measurements in the Wake of the Swept Wing Flow Test Model at the National Transonic Facility

Le résumé fourni par la source

Femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging (FLEET) was applied to obtain flowfield velocity data for the Swept Wing Flow Test (SWiFT) at the NASA Langley Research Center National Transonic Facility (NTF). Despite numerous challenges associated with performing flow velocimetry measurements within a large-scale cryogenic wind tunnel facility, the experimental campaign was conducted under various conditions, including dry air at 320 K, cool nitrogen at 240 K, and Mach numbers of 0.2 and 0.8. FLEET velocimetry measurements were performed in the downstream wake of the SWiFT model, providing a quantitative dataset. This dataset includes one-dimensional velocity profiles and two-dimensional velocity maps acquired at different angles of attack and Reynolds numbers. The two-dimensional single component velocity maps indicate relatively uniform flow across the 120-mm wide wake flow survey suggesting that the main flow features can be represented by single-position linear velocity profiles. The measured instantaneous velocity profiles at variable angles of attack are compared to model lift coefficient information obtained at Mach 0.2. At high Reynolds numbers, a sudden velocity decrease was observed in the FLEET measurements at the same time as stall in lift coefficient was observed. At a low Reynolds number, both the velocity profiles and the lift coefficient show a smoother transition, without a sudden stall. Furthermore, the two-dimensional, one component velocity map reveals a velocity deficit region at Mach 0.8 at various angles of attack. Both single shot and mean velocity measurements were acquired allowing assessment of flowfield fluctuations and measurement precisions. The uncertainties are within 4 m/s in mean measurements based on repeatability data and about 5 m/s in instantaneous single-shot measurements. Measurements are reported with ~4.8 mm spatial resolution with 32-pixel averaging used to reduce measurement errors.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.