Surgical technique analysis using dynamic measurement of surgical instruments for practical laparoscopic surgery training*
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
To improve the efficiency of surgical skill transfer and proficiency in laparoscopic surgery, an objective method of quantifying surgical skills was developed. Surgical trainings for laparoscopic nephrectomy were conducted using cadavers, and the movements of surgical instruments were measured using Mocap system in 46 trainings. Because the surgical techniques required are different depending on the surgical process, the entire nephrectomy was divided into three surgical processes (Part 1: colon mobilization, Part 2: renal vascularization, and Part 3: dissection of the remaining tissue), and skill analysis was performed for each process. Surgeons were categorized into three groups according to the number of surgical experiences (novice: 0-9 surgeries, intermediate: 10-49 surgeries, and experts: 50 or more). Three-group tests were conducted on 111 features extracted from the surgical instrument movement data. The three-group tests showed that there were significant differences among the three groups in the surgical processes: part 1, part 2, and part 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using the features that showed significant differences in the efficiency of the operation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Surgical technique analysis using dynamic measurement of surgical instruments for practical laparoscopic surgery training<sup>*</sup>
- Date Crossref
- 21/01/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.