Use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors and risk of dementia: A population‐based cohort study
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) on dementia risk have not been assessed in the Chinese population. We aimed to assess the association between the use of SGLT-2i and dementia incidence in a mainland Chinese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A target trial of SGLT-2i vs. dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) was emulated, with cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who were new users of SGLT-2i or DPP-4i being assembled using the Yinzhou Regional Health Care Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to control potential confounding, and a Cox model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of the association between the use of SGLT-2i and incident dementia. RESULTS: The final cohort included 47 335 new users of DPP-4i or SGLT-2i. In the primary analysis, the incidence of dementia was 500.2 and 347.5 per 100 000 person-years in users of DPP-4i and SGLT-2i, respectively. SGLT-2i use was associated with a reduced risk of incident dementia after adjusting for potential confounding using IPTW, with an HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60-0.93). The results were generally consistent in various subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SGLT-2i is associated with a decreased risk of dementia incidence in the study population in mainland China.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors and risk of dementia: A population‐based cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 10/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.