Sural nerve injury in Behçet’s disease patients treated with thalidomide
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Thalidomide has shown exceptional results in the management of Behçet's disease. Despite its efficacy, thalidomide is associated with a number of adverse effects, including peripheral neuropathy. This study aims to characterize the pathologic features of neuropathy in Behçet's disease patients who received thalidomide therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive adult Behçet's disease patients who received thalidomide and developed neuropathy were collected. Clinical manifestations, electrophysiologic evaluations, and pathologic findings were studied. RESULTS: Three patients who met the inclusion criteria were collected. Sensory deficits, particularly in the lower extremities, emerged in a length-dependent manner 6 - 12 months after initiation of thalidomide therapy. Symptoms remained unchanged after discontinuation of thalidomide for 2 years. Electrophysiologic evaluations showed sensory axonal polyneuropathy in all 3 patients who also received sural nerve biopsy. Histological findings confirmed axonal degenerations. A noteworthy finding was neurofilament accumulation in both myelinated and unmyelinated axons. DISCUSSION: Sensory fibers, particularly in the lower extremities, were susceptible to thalidomide therapy. The features of thalidomide-induced neuropathy are characterized as axonal degeneration. CONCLUSION: Earlier recognition of thalidomide-induced sensory axonal neuropathy should be carried out in patients with Behçet's disease during the thalidomide therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Sural nerve injury in Behçet’s disease patients treated with thalidomide
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.