rpoB mutations and their association with rifampicin resistance in clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus epidermidis is a ubiquitous member of the healthy skin and mucous microbiota but is also an opportunistic pathogen responsible for various infections, often treated with antibiotics like rifampicin. Resistance to rifampicin in S. epidermidis arises primarily through nonsynonymous mutations in the rpoB gene. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of rpoB mutations and their association with phenotypic rifampicin resistance in clinical S. epidermidis isolates from Denmark, France, and Sweden. METHODS: All clinical isolates (N = 942) were whole-genome sequenced to identify mutations in rpoB and subsequently linked to phenotypic rifampicin resistance based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. RESULTS: A total of 64 (6.8%) isolates were resistant to rifampicin. They carried all mutational changes in the rifampicin resistance-determining region (RRDR). Among 12 identified nonsynonymous mutations, 11 were exclusively observed in resistant strains, including novel mutations not previously described in S. epidermidis. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the diverse genetic variants of rpoB associated with rifampicin resistance in clinical S. epidermidis isolates, including novel mutations. The strong correlation between mutational changes in RRDR and phenotypic resistance reinforces the role of rpoB mutations as a primary mechanism of resistance in clinical isolates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- <i>rpoB</i> mutations and their association with rifampicin resistance in clinical <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>
- Date Crossref
- 06/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.