Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

ASSESSMENT IN CLIL: TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Over the last two decades in Spain there have been many efforts aimed at implementing of bilingual education and training Primary Education teachers in the methodological approach known as CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning). However, assessing children’s progress in CLIL presents many difficulties, due to the varied contexts and also to the difficulty of finding assessment tools that measure both content and linguistic competence from a truly integrated perspective. Given the importance of this issue, this research addresses how the assessment process is carried out in the upper cycle of Primary Education in schools in the Community of Andalusia. It is a mixed method research (quantitate and qualitative) whose main objective is to analyze, through teachers’ opinions, aspects such as the training they have received, their competence in assessment practices and the difficulties they face. In order to collect data, a questionnaire was sent online to Primary schools. The analysis shows that the difficulties presented by teachers are many, but the growing interest in formative assessment in the educational field and specifically in CLIL approach is perceived as a central aspect to carry out an authentic integration of language and content and, through the assessment process, to contribute to the achievement of quality bilingual education.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
ASSESSMENT IN CLIL: TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE LA EVALUACIÓN EN AICLE: PERSPECTIVA DEL PROFESORADO
Date Crossref
31/01/2025
Éditeur
Universidad de Alcala
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Student Assessment and FeedbackEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.