Targeted ubiquitination of Na V 1.8 reduces sensory neuronal excitability
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Chronic pain and addiction are a significant global health challenge. Voltage-gated sodium channel Na V 1.8, a pivotal driver of pain signaling, is a clinically validated target for the development of novel, non-addictive pain therapeutics. Small molecule inhibitors against Na V 1.8 have shown promise in acute pain indications, but large clinical effect sizes have not yet been demonstrated and efficacy in chronic pain indications are lacking. An alternative strategy to target Na V 1.8 channels for analgesia is to reduce the number of channels that are present on nociceptor membranes. We generated a therapeutic heterobifunctional protein, named UbiquiNa V , that contains a Na V 1.8-selective binding module and the catalytic subunit of the NEDD4 E3 Ubiquitin ligase. We show that UbiquiNav significantly reduces channel expression in the plasma membrane and reduces Na V 1.8 currents in rodent sensory neurons. We demonstrate that UbiquiNa V is selective for Na V 1.8 over other Na V isoforms and other components of the sensory neuronal electrogenisome. We then show that UbiquiNa V normalizes the distribution of Na V 1.8 protein to distal axons, and that UbiquiNa V normalizes the neuronal hyperexcitability in in vitro models of inflammatory and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Our results serve as a blueprint for the design of therapeutics that leverage the selective ubiquitination of Na V 1.8 channels for analgesia.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Targeted ubiquitination of Na <sub>V</sub> 1.8 reduces sensory neuronal excitability
- Date Crossref
- 04/02/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.