Personalized Cancer Therapy: Advancement in Biomarker-Based Treatment Strategies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Résumé fourni par la source
This study sought to assess the effectiveness of biomarker-directed personalized therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) targeting actionable genetic mutations like EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1. A prospective observational study was performed on 200 NSCLC patients with established genetic alterations, divided into four groups: EGFR-mutant, ALK-rearranged, PD-L1-positive, and wild-type (no biomarkers). Patients were treated with targeted therapies (e.g., EGFR inhibitors, ALK inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors) or platinum-based chemotherapy. EGFR-mutant patients had the best response rates (70%) and overall survival (OS) of 24 months. ALK-rearranged and PD-L1-positive patients also had good outcomes, with response rates of 65% and 60%, respectively, and OS of 22 and 20 months. In contrast, the wild-type group had the worst response rate (45%) and OS (16 months). The study also found significantly fewer adverse events in the EGFR and ALK treatment groups than with chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated better progression-free survival (PFS) in the biomarker-targeted groups. Statistical analysis using ANOVA and chi-square tests proved significant differences in response rates (p-value < 0.05), validating the effectiveness of biomarker-directed personalized treatment approaches. These findings suggest that biomarker-directed therapies can significantly enhance patient outcomes compared to standard chemotherapy, highlighting the value of biomarker testing in clinical practice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Personalized Cancer Therapy: Advancement in Biomarker-Based Treatment Strategies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Date Crossref
- 30/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Indus Publishers
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.